Cases 1 - 10 of 8,430
Cole v. Skinner
as 4:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Jamie Lee Cole
Respondent:
Beth Skinner
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flook v. Haynes
as 2:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Roger W Flook, Jr.
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Wilkens et al
as 4:2024cv03563
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Claudia Wilkens, Judge Jeffrey S. White, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Ramos et al
as 8:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Rafel Rogers
Defendant:
Luis Efren Ramos, Jr. and Bernardo Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray Rogers v. Donald Wenk
as 24-6574
Plaintiff:
RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
Defendant:
DONALD WENK, ERIC EDWARDS, NATHANIEL BROTHERS and others
Salazar-Salazar (PS) v. Celia
as 1:2024cv01640
Petitioner:
Roger Javier Salazar-Salazar
Respondent:
Celia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Mitchell
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Tiger A Rogers
Defendant:
Mekel Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canales v. Rayford et al
as 5:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Canales
Defendant:
Senior Warden Phonso J. Rayford, Correctional Officer Vanessa Valero, Correctional Officer Ruth Trice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
ROGER CHANDLER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
