Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Johnson v. USA
as 8:2018cv02019
Plaintiff:
Zebedee A. Johnson
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Johnson v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv00951
Plaintiff:
Michael Meco Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
United States of America v. One (1) Taurus PT 140 G2 Pistol Cal: 40 SN SKR71219 et al
as 1:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One (1) Taurus PT 140 G2 Pistol Cal: 40 SN SKR71219 and One (1) Iver Johnson 1900 Revolver Cal: 32 SN: 7782
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Johnson et al v. California Conservation Core et al
as 3:2003cv03251
Defendant:
U.S. Army, The Permanente Medical Group, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Lameche Jewell Jordan and Christine Grimes Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In the matter of USA v. Johnson
as 3:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Linn H Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. 1812 E. Millard Street, Johnson City, TN (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00329
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1812 E. Millard Street, Johnson City, TN
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY $79,985.00 IN U.S.
as 1:2015cv01062
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY $79,985.00 IN U.S.
Claimant:
DUANE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHNSON
as 2:2015cv01234
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHANIEL E. JOHNSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
SOLOW v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2015cv05019
Plaintiff:
ADAM M. SOLOW
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, THOMAS BRANDON, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Purnell v. Johnson
as 3:2015cv01551
Plaintiff:
Scorpio D. Purnell
Defendant:
Detective Luke Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
