Cases 31 - 40 of 233
Connors et al v. American Medical Response, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05046
Plaintiff:
Joseph Connors and Jose Luna Rubio
Defendant:
American Medical Response, Inc. and SeniorCare Emergency Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HERTEL et al v. ACTION TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01748
Plaintiff:
SPENCER SMITH, BRIAN BORDEN, MICHAEL BARNETT and others
Defendant:
ACTION TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC., LESLIE PANNELL, CONNOR PANNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michalek et al v. Village of Sugar Grove
as 1:2020cv03434
Plaintiff:
Josh Polowy and Connor Michalek
Defendant:
Village of Sugar Grove
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hurt v. PBC Cosmic Zoo LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01073
Defendant:
PBC Cosmic Zoo LLC and Brian Connor
Plaintiff:
Anecia Hurt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Connor v. Talon Air, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2020cv00903
Defendant:
Adam Katz and Talon Air, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Phillip Connor
Smiley v. Little Rock Donuts LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00102
Defendant:
Connor Grimes, Little Rock Donuts LLC and Heather Grimes
Plaintiff:
James Smiley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Connors v. Standard Insurance Company
as 3:2019cv03101
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kristie Connors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Connors v. MGM Springfield, LLC
as 3:2019cv30144
Plaintiff:
Shawn Connors
Defendant:
MGM Springfield, LLC
Castillo v. J. Coffey Contracting Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05845
Defendant:
Connor Coffey, John Coffey and J. Coffey Contracting Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Quiroz Castillo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Connor, M.D. v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, et al.
as 4:2019cv06552
Plaintiff:
Caroline L. Connor, M.D.
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and Humboldt Medical Specialists, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
