Cases 91 - 100 of 30,777
LANGHAM v. HUNT
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
BRYAN DALE LANGHAM
Defendant:
DR CYNTHIA HUNT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trejo v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony R. Trejo
Defendant:
U.S. President Joe Biden, U.S. Vice President, Texas Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Burt v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6466
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEIGH BURT
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Head Virginia Prisons, DR. WILLIAM MILES, Physician and DR. HENCHCROFF, Orthopedic Specialist
Rhodes v. Ford
as 24-3106
Plaintiff:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant:
D. FORD, LTA, D. LUNSFORD, SSA, K. ROYAL and others
Shiva Ayyadurai v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5133
Plaintiff:
Shiva Ayyadurai, Dr.
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States and Gary Thompson, District of Columbia, Board of Elections
Myers v. Worlds et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Sean Lee Myers
Defendant:
Rachette Worlds, Dr Christopher Betts, James Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Outlaw v. Meade et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Outlaw
Defendant:
Barbara Meade, Dr. Johnson and Dr. Ober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ et al v. DR. TALBOT's et al
as 2:2024cv06148
Plaintiff:
AMIL MARTINEZ and Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of AW
Defendant:
Dr. Talbot's, Nuby, Luv n' Care, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00905
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
