Cases 91 - 100 of 213
Hooper v. Lain et al
as 2:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
Nakehba Hooper
Defendant:
David Lain, John Whidup, John Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Thompson et al
as 1:2014cv13024
Plaintiff:
John Evans
Defendant:
Michael Thompson, Dale Bissonnette, Keith Nano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert McCann v. Borough of Magnolia, et al
as 14-2077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MCCANN
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF MAGNOLIA, BETTY CARSON, HONORABLE MAYOR, BORO OF MAGNOLIA (PERSONALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY), JOHN EVANS, CHIEF OF POLICE, BORO OF MAGNOLIA (PERSONALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY) and others
Evans v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01398
Plaintiff:
John Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Joyner
as 5:2014hc02029
Petitioner:
F. John Evans
Respondent:
Carlton B. Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig Childress v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 14-1204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG A. CHILDRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., Director of Illinois Department of Corrections, JOHN EVANS, Warden, ROBERT HILLIARD, Warden and others
MCCANN v. THE BOROUGH OF MAGNOLIA et al
as 1:2014cv00170
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCCANN
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF MAGNOLIA, BETTY ANN COWLING-CARSON, JOHN EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Nooth
as 2:2013cv02008
Petitioner:
Christopher John Evans
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Mizic
as 1:2013mc00485
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Evan Mizic
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Mizic
as 1:2013mc00433
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
John Evan Mizic
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
