Cases 91 - 100 of 675
BAUMAN v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE BAUMAN
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Weldeyohannes v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv05526
Plaintiff:
Mussie E Weldeyohannes
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington Corrections Center, John Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. John Watkins
as 23-3467
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN LEE WATKINS
Marks v. Patel
as 4:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
John Lee Marks, Jr.
Defendant:
Al Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marks v. Ukiah Police Department
as 4:2023cv01938
Plaintiff:
John Lee Marks, Jr.
Defendant:
Ukiah Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRURY v. LEE
as 2:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. DRURY
Defendant:
JOHN LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
USA v. John Watkins
as 23-3091
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN LEE WATKINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
