Cases 91 - 100 of 6,020
Johnson v. Chapin, et al
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID CHAPIN, JESSICA AGGSON, FNU STEIN, Lt. and others
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 0:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
John Foster Norris
Respondent:
Captain Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawson v. Hummer, et al.
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Devin M Lawson
Defendant:
Deputy Hummer, Kootenai County Sheriff's Office and Sgt. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Logan et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Officer Brandon Logan, Officer William Snyder, Capt. Wes Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norris v. Dulgov
as 24-57
Petitioner / Appellant:
WEBSTER WAYNE NORRIS, III
Respondent / Appellee:
A. H. DULGOV, Warden
MURTAUGH v. GOGGIN & DUCKWORTH, P.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
SEAN MURTAUGH
Defendant:
ROBERT S. GOGGIN, III, GOGGIN & DUCKWORTH, P.C., FORCENO GOGGIN & KELLER, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alexis v. Ryder System Inc
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Norris Alexis
Defendant:
Ryder System, Inc and Ryder System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Porter v. King et al
as 6:2023cv03395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter
Defendant:
M King, VerPloeg, M Tizen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Valentine et al
as 3:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Alexander Maldonado, Jr.
Defendant:
Anna Valentine, Steven Crawford, Hilary Rucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. Uhaul Company et al
as 4:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Delano A. Middleton
Defendant:
Uhaul Company, City of Savannah Police Dept., Sheriff John Wilcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
