Cases 91 - 100 of 118
Ewing et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01497
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lee Ewing , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacob v. Anderson et al
as 1:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lee Jacob
Defendant:
Donald Anderson, Joseph Hughes, Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. DURO DYNE NATIONAL CORP.
as 2:2011cv63113
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SMITH and NANCY LEE SMITH
Defendant:
DURO DYNE NATIONAL CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
RAYMARK CORP. and UNIROYAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62906
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SMITH and NANCY LEE SMITH
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Sixtus et al
as 0:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lee
Defendant:
Leonhard Sixtus and Danax Express, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jo Armuth v. John Linton et al
as 2:2011cv00220
Defendant:
AG Skincare, LLC, Best Formulations, Biozone Laboratories, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Aminogenesis LLC, Ron Cummings, Ronald Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Jo Armuth
Counter Claimant:
Biozone Laboratories, Inc., Todd Kesselman and Mercatis Media, LLC
Pua v. USA
as 3:2010cv04845
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nancy Lee Tan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Estate of Nancy Lee Richter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 4:2010cv01011
Plaintiff:
Estate of Nancy Lee Richter
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
USA v. Nancy Tan
as 10-10473
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NANCY LEE TAN, AKA Nancy Tan Pua, AKA Nancy Tan
Navarrete v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv00317
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lee Navarrete
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
