Cases 91 - 100 of 137
Olson v. Penske Logistic
as 15-1380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRIS OLSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PENSKE LOGISTICS, LLC
Ragar Transportation v. Lear Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
Ragar Transportation
Defendant:
Lear Corporation , Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc and Penske Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS, WAREHOUSEMEN, AND HELPERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 135 v. PENSKE LOGISTICS, LLC
as 1:2015cv00789
Plaintiff:
CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS, WAREHOUSEMEN, AND HELPERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 135
Defendant:
PENSKE LOGISTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heinly v. Penske Truck Leasing Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv02791
Plaintiff:
Jason Heinly
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Corporation , Penske Logistics LLC , Andy Zellmann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olson v. Penske Logistics, LLC
as 1:2014cv03098
Plaintiff:
Kris Olson
Defendant:
Penske Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Rodriguez v. Penske Logistics, LLC
as 2:2014cv02061
Plaintiff:
Charles Rodriguez
Defendant:
Penske Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Level One Technologies, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. et al
as 4:2014cv01305
Plaintiff:
Level One Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. and Penske Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Local Union 557 Pension Fund v. Penske Logistics LLC
as 14-1464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREIGHT DRIVERS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 557 PENSION FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
PENSKE LOGISTICS LLC and PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
