Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 31,606
Wilson v. U.S Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2024cv11021
Plaintiff: Raymond Wilson
Defendant: U.S Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant: 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
USA v. Raymond Lee
as 24-11190
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAYMOND CHARLES LEE
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff: North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant: Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Snider v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65282
Plaintiff: Raymond Snider
Defendant: Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Office v. Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff: Brandon J Office
Defendant: Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. MICHAEL et al
as 3:2024cv04961
Defendant: GEORGE BESHAY, RAYMONDE MICHAEL, GEORGE MALEK BESHAI and others
Plaintiff: LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
McGillick v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01770
Plaintiff: Raymond McGillick
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Raymond May, Jr. v. Martin Fein Interest Ltd.
as 24-1323
Plaintiff: RAYMOND EARL MAY, JR. and ANGELA DOLORES MAY
Defendant: MARTIN FEIN INTEREST LTD.
Shaffer v. Madden
as 24-2343
Petitioner: SHAWN EDWARD SHAFFER
Respondent: RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?