Cases 91 - 100 of 2,046
Roach v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11826
Plaintiff:
Larry Roach
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roach v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02559
Plaintiff:
Larry Roach
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NavSav Holdings LLC v. Unico Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
NavSav Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Unico Group, Inc., Austin Beber, Cody Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Leon Roache v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3628
Petitioner:
LEON GARFIELD ROACHE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
QBE Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. v. Roach et al
as 3:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Samuel Roach doing business as First Coast Stucco and Drees Homes of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Stringer v. Bhamini et al
as 2:2023cv11829
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Stringer
Defendant:
Shdhir Bhamini, Adria Roach, Cherie Brown and others
Alexander v. Gleeson et al
as 1:2023cv05663
Plaintiff:
Owen Marlon Alexander
Defendant:
Andreea Gleeson, TuneCore Inc., Devon Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pearson v. Roach et al
as 5:2023ct03203
Plaintiff:
Antonio Yulander Pearson
Defendant:
Mr. Roach, Mr. White and North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03204
Plaintiff:
Greg H. Johnson
Defendant:
Sergeant Cooper, A. Threat, Officer Canon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
