Cases 91 - 100 of 116
Phillips v. Equity Residential Mgmt., LLC
as 16-1254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT PHILLIPS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.
Woods v. San Francisco
as 3:2015cv05666
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Woods
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Charles August, Nicholas Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips et al v. HCC Life Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv15342
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillips and Cynthia Phillips
Defendant:
HCC Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2015cv04879
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Scott Phillips and Suzanne Schmidt Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steinhauer v. Brezinski et al
as 1:2015cv01177
Plaintiff:
David C. Steinhauer
Defendant:
Cynthia L. Brezinski and Scott Phillip Walthius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv02349
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillips
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation , Global Spectrum LP and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HENRETTY v. CREWS
as 3:2014cv00177
Petitioner:
SCOTT PHILLIP HENRETTY
Respondent:
MICHAEL CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Costa, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00747
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillips
Defendant:
Costa, Inc., David G. Whalen, Russell A. Boss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dynes v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv23087
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dynes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Cook Medical Incorporated, Scott Phillip Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dynes v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01581
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dynes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Cook Medical Incorporated, Scott Phillip Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
