Cases 101 - 110 of 918
Ali #462773 v. Corizon Medical Provider et al
as 1:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Michigan Correction Department and Corizon Medical Provider
Plaintiff:
Omar Khattim Ali #462773
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Givens v. Corizon Medical
as 4:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Darrin Jewele Givens
Defendant:
Corizon Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schroder v. Corizon Medical et al
as 1:2021cv00052
Defendant:
Rona Siegart, Jay Christensen, PA Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Noah Schroder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Engel v. Corizon Medical Services, et al
as 21-1125
Defendant / Appellee:
Director of Probation & Parole, Fenton St. Antony Urgent Care, Jefferson County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Sturgis v. Warden of WCI et al
as 8:2021cv00098
Defendant:
CO II Piel, Sgt. Sgt. Davis, Head of Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Carrington Sturgis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bledsoe v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Elizabeth Atterbury, Robert Killian, Anne Precythe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleeman v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, LLC, Andrea Crader, Bonnie Boley and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fleeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodyard v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 5:2020cv02021
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Dr Gilbardi
Plaintiff:
Draper F Woodyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. Corizon, et al
as 4:2020cv01738
Defendant:
ERDCC and Corizon Medical
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kitko #330785 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Thomas Staab, Donna Mendoza, Corizon Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Frank G Kitko, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
