Cases 101 - 110 of 211
PITTMAN v. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 3:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2017cv04116
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Tulalip Tribes Finance & Member & Employees et al
as 2:2017cv01155
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Jones
Defendant:
Tulalip Tribes Finance & Member & Employees, JK Tsoodle, Sharon Jones Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Nathaniel Washington et al v. Global Tel Link Corporation
as 2:2017cv05312
Plaintiff:
David Babtkis, Michael Mccarns, Geoff Mills and others
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation and Brian D. Oliver
Alexander et al v. Global Tel Link Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth R. Alexander , John P. Alexander , Mary Sessums and others
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Christopher Epps, Sam Waggoner and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Valsaint v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
as 1:2017cv22282
Plaintiff:
Alveronick Valsaint
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Kimmell v. City of Sparks, et al
as 17-15875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT KIMMELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SPARKS, COUNTY OF WASHOE, CHUCK ALLEN and others
Kitterman v. Dennison et al
as 3:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Shane A Kitterman
Defendant:
Jeff Dennison, Jason Garnett, Joanne Hosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Pompura v. Visa, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00518
Plaintiff:
Shane M Pompura
Defendant:
Visa, Inc., Metabank, Meta Bank Financial Group and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
