Cases 101 - 110 of 531
Gonzalez-Reyes v. Parker et al
as 6:2017cv06546
Plaintiff:
Manuel Nicolas Gonzalez-Reyes
Defendant:
Parker, Fossil, O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOMAR v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01035
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR BOMAR
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , JOHN E. WETZEL , ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.H. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03520
Plaintiff:
J.H.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , THOMAS O'NEILL, RICHARD ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04703
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe 1-3 and James P. O'Neill
Plaintiff:
Adrian L. Morgan
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blank v. Nuszen et al
as 4:2017cv02376
Plaintiff:
Miriam Blank
Defendant:
Jack Nuszen, Shannon Orand Nuszen, Ricardo Lazaro Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leckrone v. Saint Charles County, Missouri et al
as 4:2017cv02144
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Leckrone
Defendant:
Saint Charles County, Missouri, Robert Bell and Mark O'Neill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Neill v. Gautreaux, et al.
as 3:2017cv00479
Defendant:
Unknown Cochran, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Unknown McJinsey and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Sue O'Neill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neill v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2017cv05569
Plaintiff:
Gregory O'Neill
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Pippin v. City of Reynoldsburg, et al.
as 2:2017cv00598
Plaintiff:
James Pippin
Defendant:
City of Reynoldsburg, Jim O'Neill and Shane M. Mauger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
