Cases 101 - 110 of 285
ROJAS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03222
Plaintiff:
JOSE FILIBERTO ROJAS, DUSTIN JAY SANDERLIN, RYAN SCHUCK and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALEXANDER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03193
Plaintiff:
PHILIP CALLIGAN, ASHLEY RIVERA, JAMES P. MCCOOL and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rojas et al v. Saulsberry et al
as 0:2019cv02208
Plaintiff:
Jose Filiberto Rojas, Dustin Jay Sanderlin, Ryan Schuck and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
Alexander et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02174
Plaintiff:
Philip Calligan, Ashley Rivera, James P. McCool and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
US v. Timothy Hardin
as 19-4556
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT HARDIN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Caramillo v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00362
Defendant:
Susan D. Anderson, NP, Caniff, Timothy Wright, LPN and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Caramillo, Administrator of the Estate of Regina Marie Honeycutt, Deceased
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Kadeem Burden, et al
as 19-30394
Defendant / Appellant:
KADEEM BURDEN and TIMMY SCOTT, also known as Timothy Scott
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bishop v. USA
as 1:2019cv00030
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy Scott Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Swenstad et al
as 3:2019cv00223
Defendant:
Any Unknown Heirs of Louise A. Stackhouse, and Their Unknown Spouses, Pamela Swenstad, Denise Avery and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
