Cases 101 - 110 of 1,184,691
United States of America v. Gary
as 1:2024cv03818
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Gary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Amaya v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv03828
Petitioner:
Daniel Amaya
Respondent:
Chance Jones, Latoya Hughes and Kwame Raoulm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vinet v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03807
Petitioner:
Richard J. Vinet
Respondent:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2024cv03822
Plaintiff:
Amireon Williams
Defendant:
John D. Idleburg, N. Kalfas and Gholar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50176
Plaintiff:
Dan Smith
Defendant:
Director Latoya Hughes, Warden Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. DHS
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A Brown
Defendant:
DHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
Trent Allen Williams
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. (lnu) (1) et al
as 5:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2), Johnson County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coates v. Lt. Keistler et al
as 1:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Alkein Coates
Defendant:
Lt. Keistler, Tyler, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowling v. Spohn et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Roger Bowling
Defendant:
Nathan Spohn, Unknown James and Unknown Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
