Cases 111 - 118 of 118
Harris v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wayne Harris, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Robert M Stevenson, III, J Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Moore v. Ozmint et al
as 2:2007cv02265
Plaintiff:
Daniel Moore
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Robert Ward, Stan Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Moore et al v. Lake County Department of Job and Family Services et al
as 1:2007cv01852
Plaintiff:
Jianna Moore, Jianna Moore, Danielle Moore and others
Defendant:
Lake County Department of Job and Family Services, Lake County Department of Job and Family Services, Matthew Battiato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 3:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
Dora Moore, Dora Moore, Daniel Moore and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Mediator:
Thomas R Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moore v. Maness
as 1:2007cv00028
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Moore
Defendant:
Tom Maness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Schriro et al
as 2:2007cv00112
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Moore
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, John Doe, Richard A Bock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THE FUND FOR ANIMALS et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2003cv00677
Plaintiff:
FUND FOR ANIMALS , GRACE VAN VLECK , JIM ROBERTSON and others
Defendant:
STEVEN WILLIAMS and GALE NORTON
Intervenor_defendant:
US SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE , SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION and SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
