Cases 111 - 120 of 203,151
Doe (PDB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
John Doe (PDB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King et al v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Matt King and David Moore
Defendant:
Harmeet Singh and Leader Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
DAVIS v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD, VICE CHAIRMAN DAVID HERRING, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Christopher Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarthy v. Kaplan
as 24-1563
Plaintiff:
ANA MCCARTHY
Defendant:
DAVID KAPLAN, GABRIEL CLAGUE, SAMANTHA CLAGUE and others
Farley v. Village of New Lebanon et al
as 3:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Joshua Farley
Defendant:
Village of New Lebanon, Raymond Arriola, Curtis Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN WATTS, TRAYVON J. TUMER, ELIJAH GIORDINA and others
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SHAUN EDMUNSON, BRENDA MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultry v. Harbert Realty Services, LLC
as 2:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
David Moultry
Defendant:
Harbert Realty Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert R. Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wanda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
