Cases 111 - 120 of 691
Ward v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv08792
Plaintiff:
Kareem Ward
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Grand Lodge of Free Accepted Mason and Williams J. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FONTANEZ v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv03540
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO FONTANEZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN and JANET YELLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tito Knox v. Officer Graham
as 23-7177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITO LEMONT KNOX
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER GRAHAM, JOE BIDEN, S. RICE and others
McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Brentrez McPherson and Royal High Chief Priest BaBA
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Tyrone Oliver, Jacob Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gleave v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Cherie Chalyce Gleave
Defendant:
United States, Joe Biden, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
KNIGHT v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv03493
Plaintiff:
NICKHOLAS KNIGHT, SR.
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, DHS, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ukena v. Swift et al
as 3:2023cv50416
Plaintiff:
Jason James Ukena and Man and His Guitar
Defendant:
Taylor Swift, Tim Zallinger, Saint Paul Lutheran Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVID v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02084
Petitioner:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. Biden et al
as 2:2023cv01515
Plaintiff:
David John Young
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Biden Administration, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Stout et al
as 3:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Wesley Edward Smith, III
Defendant:
Walter W. Stout, Robert A. Dybing, Bevill Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
