Cases 111 - 120 of 214
Hines v. Dayton et al
as 0:2018cv03004
Defendant:
Brenda Smith, Stephan Cranna, Brandon Huynh and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eppler et al v. Ryan
as 3:2018cv08229
Plaintiff:
Chad A Coker, Anthony Gaines, Robert Sedova and others
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sharp County Detention Center
as 1:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Charles Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Sharp County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Johnson v. Kimberly Smith
as 18-1686
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
KIMBERLY SMITH
Chism et al v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2018cv00534
Plaintiff:
James Chism , Timothy Braddock , Matthew Johnson and others
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County and Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Johnson v. W.S.M. Inc., S.I.
as 1:2018cv00046
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
W.S.M., Inc. S.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. W.S.M. Inc., S.I.
as 4:2018cv00335
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
W.S.M., Inc. S.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wesco Insurance Company v. Kisling, Nestico & Redick, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Wesco Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kisling, Nestico & Redick, LLC , Alberto Nestico , Robert Redick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Johnson, et al v. David Mazza, et al
as 17-56783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JOHNSON, NATHAN JOHNSON, GEMINI PARTNERS, INC., a California corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MAZZA, PAUL M. WEST, ANTHONY ALLEN WOOD and others
United States of America v. Johnson (Napolitano)
as 17-2561
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Warren G. Johnson, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Donald Ryder, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Jamaine Ryder, AKA Sealed Defendant 3 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Peter Napolitano, AKA Sealed Defendant 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
