Cases 121 - 130 of 241
Hall v. Texas County, Missouri et al
as 6:2016cv03126
Defendant:
Texas County, Missouri, Texas County Jail, Pam Tripp and others
Plaintiff:
Hall and Robert David Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Texas County, Missouri et al
as 6:2016cv03116
Plaintiff:
Robert David Hall
Defendant:
Texas County, Missouri, James Sigman and Pam Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 5:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
David Hall
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RANKIN et al v. HALL et al
as 2:2015cv00480
Plaintiff:
MARK RANKIN and KELLY BENNETT
Defendant:
DAVID HALL, ANDREW FEENEY and UNKNOWN SHERIFF'S OFFICERS AND/OR OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaDouceur #708704 v. First et al
as 1:2015cv01179
Plaintiff:
Donald L. LaDouceur #708704, Jr.
Defendant:
D. First, B. Risk, R. Drabek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rand-Heart of New York, Inc., et al v. James P. Dolan, et al
as 15-1838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rand-Heart of New York, Inc., Michael Rodolico, Ian Henderson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
James P. Dolan and Vicki J. Duncomb
Donselman et al v. Prim Hall Enterprises, Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Donnie Donselman and Bindery Innovations of Kentucky, LLC
Defendant:
Prim Hall Enterprises, Inc, John Prim, David Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hall v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2015cv10433
Plaintiff:
David Hall
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. and Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
