Cases 121 - 130 of 1,183,246
Smith-Catchings v. Tripp et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lushun Smith-Catchings
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Rebecca Bowker, Brad Peterson and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noonan v. USA
as 5:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Deanthony L. Noonan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hollins v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Earl Hollins
Defendant:
Lt Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Staton v. USA
as 2:2024cv11130
Petitioner:
Christopher Staton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mahan v. Genesee County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv11132
Plaintiff:
Tyrone William Mahan
Defendant:
Genesee County Jail, Advance Correctional Health, Skinner and others
Patton v. Frank et al
as 4:2024cv11129
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Patton, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank, Shae, Vanwormer and others
Daniels #657826 v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and Unknown Collinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fry v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01538
Petitioner:
Bruce Renault Fry
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGhee v. Meaux et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Xavier McGhee
Defendant:
Chief Investigator Danny Meaux, Judge Robert Arnold, Attorney At Law Gus Sermos and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
