Cases 141 - 150 of 3,864
Oriyomi Sadiq Aloba v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-13736
Petitioner / Appellant:
ORIYOMI ALOBA and ORIYOMI SADDIQ ALOBA
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Coplen v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Antwan Elvago Coplen
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHIRLEY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2023cv04328
Plaintiff:
JOHN SHIRLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and USPS
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Duffy v. Magilligan et al
as 8:2023cv02604
Plaintiff:
John Duffy
Defendant:
Tom Magilligan, Edward Haab, USPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William James Milner et al v. United States et al
as 5:2023cv02566
Plaintiff:
William James Milner and Maria Gracia De Luna
Petitioner:
Candace Pease
Defendant:
USPS, United States and Does 1 to 100
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 2:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Demaurea Davis and De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Manuel v. Parrett et al
as 1:2023cv13232
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Manuel
Defendant:
Khalid L Parrett, United States Department of Justice and USPS Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Delgado v. Warden at USP Yazoo City MA
as 3:2023cv03106
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Sanchez Delgado
Defendant:
Warden at USP Yazoo City MA
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marshall Williams v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 23-13759
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
