Cases 151 - 160 of 3,444
Seay et al v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Marilyn E Seay Propst, Charles Propst, Kathy Propst and others
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Jerry Moore, Jeff Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. AT&T CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv02771
Plaintiff:
CORETEL WEST VIRGINIA, INC., CORETEL VIRGINIA, LLC, CORETEL NEW JERSEY, INC. and others
Defendant:
AT&T CORPORATION and AT&T CORP.
Petitioner:
AFFINITY NETWORK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 33
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
Deberry v. Wade et al
as 2:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
David Deberry
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Justin Wade, Correctional Officers Does and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain Two Natural Gas Storage Wells and an Access Road Across 54.12 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Kanawha County, West Virginia et al
as 2:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain Two Natural Gas Storage Wells and an Access Road Across 54.12 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Kanawha County, West Virginia, 18.5 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Kanawha County, West Virginia, Patricia Jo Morton Ranson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Wiley edu, LLC v. West Virginia State University
as 2:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Wiley edu, LLC
Defendant:
West Virginia State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Whaling v. State of WV
as 2:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cole Whaling
Defendant:
Jim Justice, State of West Virginia, Patrick Morrisey and others
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Charles Wendt v. Marshall County Coal Resources, Inc.
as 23-1875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES WENDT, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
MARSHALL COUNTY COAL RESOURCES, INC., a Delaware corporation and WEST VIRGINIA LAND RESOURCES, INC., a Delaware corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
