Cases 11 - 20 of 3,943
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Newman, et al.
as 24-3536
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Defendant:
TROY NEWMAN and ALBIN RHOMBERG
Gamez #131401 v. Lesinski et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Robert Carrasco Gamez, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Lesinski, Unknown McElroy, Travis Fitzgibbon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
April Norman
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Art Dahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024at00689
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Marcus Johnson, Luis Gonzalez, Richard Montes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Marcus Johnson, Luis Gonzalez, Richard Montes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ABNER, SHANE BOGGS, PATRICK BOWLING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stokes v. Bateman
as 7:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Monte M. Stokes
Defendant:
Assistant Warden J. Bateman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Monte v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02775
Plaintiff:
Steven Christopher Monte, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
