Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Gando Amat et al v. Hand To Hand Express et al
as 1:2021cv01564
Defendant:
Angelito Aquino-Santana and Hand To Hand Express
Plaintiff:
Lilia Haydee Garcia and Juan Alfredo Gando Amat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au
Colts v. City of Rome et al
as 4:2021cv00027
Defendant:
John Doe(1-3), Officer Amats, Officer Nick Harrell and others
Plaintiff:
Tami Colts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amator v. Principal Financial Group et al
as 2:2020cv02324
Defendant:
Mutual Insurance Company of Arizona and Principal Financial Group doing business as Principal Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Jane T Amator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Williams v. Yanez et al
as 3:2020cv00738
Defendant:
A. Amat, A. Young, Ralph M. Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS550 Amatic, Cuprite Brown, Sedan 4 DR, 4.6L V8 F DOHC 32V, VIN: WDDLJ9BB1DA064244
as 3:2019cv01887
Defendant:
2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS550 Amatic, Cuprite Brown, Sedan 4 DR, 4.6L V8 F DOHC 32V, VIN: WDDLJ9BB1DA064244
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Emcasco Insurance Company v. Amates, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00478
Plaintiff:
Emcasco Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amates, Inc. and Amates II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Amat v. Rey Pizza Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv24687
Plaintiff:
Julio Amat
Defendant:
Rey Pizza Corp. and Arch Resources Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
