Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Brislinger v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 4:2026cv00507
Plaintiff:
Becky Brislinger
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Martin v. City of Portland, et al.
as 26-3777
Plaintiff:
DAVID P. MARTIN and We the people, et al
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH, TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION and others
Cripe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01989
Plaintiff:
Becky Cripe
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arnold v. NaphCare et al
as 4:2026cv05080
Plaintiff:
David Ray Arnold
Defendant:
Lisa Mitchell, Becky, NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNNS v. SCOTT et al
as 3:2026cv06063
Plaintiff:
HOWARD L. DUNNS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, RONALD D. EDWARDS, OFFICER BELTRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURTIS v. CURETON et al
as 2:2026cv06001
Plaintiff:
DEVIN CURTIS and KIRA CURTIS
Defendant:
ANTHONY CURETON, BERGEN COUNTY CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LIEUTENANT JARRED UST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03120
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hines v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2026cv00987
Plaintiff:
Becky Hines
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
