Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Christopher Stone v. Balubhai G. Patel et al
as 2:2022cv00947
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stone, an individual and Christopher Stone
Defendant:
Balubhai G. Patel, an individual and trustee of the Balubhai G. Patel Revocable Trust dated March 14, 2007, Mayur B. Patel, an individual, Pravin Ahir, an individual and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Stone v. Glass et al
as 1:2021cv01405
Defendant:
Michael Williams, Deputy Poindexter, Stephen T. Glass and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09340
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. STONE et al
as 5:2020cv02779
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER STONE and EARL L. HENDERSON TRUCKING COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Froedtert South Inc v Stone
as 2:2020cv00011
Respondent:
Christopher Stone
Petitioner:
Froedtert South Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutton v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01119
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Sutton and J Lee
Defendant:
Christopher Stone, C Sasticum, Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornberry Investments, LLC v. Stone
as 1:2019cv02921
Defendant:
Christopher Stone
Plaintiff:
Thornberry Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05699
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gardner v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2018cv00660
Plaintiff:
Chad A. Gardner
Defendant:
Steven Sinclair, F. Wagner, Christopher Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
