Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Kassimali et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Maureen Kassimali , Luz Marie Alvarez , Adriana Arango and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEMELIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv09256
Plaintiff:
CATHY LEE LEMELIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Buck Lee Mau et al v. Thor Motor Coach Inc et al
as 5:2016cv02646
Defendant:
Does, Giant Inland Empire RV Center, Inc. and Thor Motor Coach Inc
Plaintiff:
Buck Lee Mau and Cathie Lee Mau
USA v. $358,077.17 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2014cv01759
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$358,077.17 in United States Currency, $44.07 in United States Currency and $880.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Robert E. Lee, Jr. and Cathy Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Jackson v. Himelick et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lynn Jackson, Sr
Defendant:
Darrell Himelick, Cathy Lee and Randy Albertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ismet Okyay Camlibel v. Cathy Lee Pattiz
as 5:2014cv02231
Plaintiff:
Ismet Okyay Camlibel
Defendant:
Cathy Lee Pattiz
Burgher v. Doe et al
as 1:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
Dennis Corey Burgher
Defendant:
John Doe, Darrell Himelick, D Michael Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beyerlein et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02078
Plaintiff:
Gordon R. Beyerlein and Cathie Lee Beyerlein
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Cathy Lee
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
