Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Lotto et al v. Luzzi et al
as 3:2017cv00446
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Lotto and Ernest Canteen
Defendant:
Michael Luzzi, Christopher Walsh, Michael Fonda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11311
Plaintiff:
Charles Burns
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Charles Burns
as 16-13976
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES BURNS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Burns v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv02703
Plaintiff:
Charles Burns
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv13919
Plaintiff:
Marsha Burns and Charles Burns
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns et al v. City of Concord et al
as 4:2014cv00535
Defendant:
Concord Police Department, Guy Swanger, Mark Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
John Burns , Tammy Burns , Bobby Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adner et al v. International Paper Co
as 3:2013cv00368
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Adner , Mable Alford , Ruthie Allen and others
Defendant:
International Paper Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Burns v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv01075
Petitioner:
Robert Charles Burns
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Standard v. Burns et al
as 3:2012cv00847
Plaintiff:
James David Standard
Defendant:
Charles Burns , H T McPherson and State National Insurance Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
