Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Watson v. Consumer Cellular
as 8:2020cv02498
Defendant:
Consumer Cellular
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kane et al v. Consumer Cellular, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01558
Plaintiff:
John Kane and Mary Bowers
Defendant:
Consumer Cellular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Instagram, Kyle ? (App Official From Ohio), App and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Prayton Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Consumer Cellular
as 3:2019cv01559
Plaintiff:
Charmane Smith
Defendant:
Consumer Cellular
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bester et al v. TracFone et al
as 2:2018cv01151
Defendant:
Target, Milwaukee County Transit System, Vortex Government Freephone and others
Plaintiff:
Maisha Kimya Bester, Andre Lashaun Kelly, Jr and Mary Jane Bester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. Consumer Cellular, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. and LPL Licensing, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Consumer Cellular, Inc.
Consol_plaintiff:
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. and LPL Licensing, L.L.C.
Consol_defendant:
Cigna Corporation , Credo Mobile, Inc. , CVS Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Consumer Cellular, Incorporated v. ConsumerAffairs.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01908
Plaintiff:
Consumer Cellular, Incorporated
Defendant:
ConsumerAffairs.com, Inc., Consumers Unified, LLC and David Zachary Carman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bell v. Consumer Cellular, Incorporated
as 3:2015cv00941
Plaintiff:
Shawna Bell
Defendant:
Consumer Cellular, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
James Boone v. Consumer Cellular
as 12-30906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. BOONE
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSUMER CELLULAR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
