Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Martell v. Kahbro et al
as 2:2021cv01733
Plaintiff:
Leandre Martell
Defendant:
E. Kahbro, N. Chandler, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00980
Plaintiff:
Attmond D. Chandler
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Supreme Ackbar v. Christopher Monaco
as 20-6872
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CONRAD, C. EARLY, RIVERA LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary
Chandler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00308
Plaintiff:
TINA D. CHANDLER
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
CHANDLER v. SHARON PD et al
as 2:2020cv00026
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY and SHARON PD
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCEY D. CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Chandler v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00095
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Rickey D. Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
336 LLC v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv03732
Plaintiff:
336 LLC , 557 Entertainment Inc. , DCD Exclusive Video Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of New York , Bill De Blasio and Rick D. Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hsin v. City of New York
as 18-751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Henry Hang Hsin, Cheng Wei Hsin, Laludia Management Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Rick D. Chandler, P.E., Dennis Burkart and others
Defendant:
Jane and John Does, Nos 1-10
Hu v. City of New York
as 18-737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Hu, NY Drilling, Inc. and 888 Consulting Corp.
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, John/Jane Doe(s), #1-10, Dennis Burkart and others
Defendant:
M. Imran
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
