Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Smith v. Medicredit Inc
as 5:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
Deborah Wilson Smith
Defendant:
Medicredit Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH v. DOLGENCORP, LLC
as 1:2021cv01608
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH J. SMITH
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP, LLC D/B/A DOLLAR GENERAL and DOLGENCORP, LLC doing business as DOLLAR GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00899
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Goldfinger et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04043
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alston, Noe Farias, Jr., Katherine Coleman and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00232
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Deborah K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louis Holger Eklund, et al v. Timothy Burgess, et al
as 20-35112
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, RICH CURTNER, MARLIN L. RITZMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY OGLE
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc. v. Payne et al
as 1:2019cv11297
Nominal Defendant:
Deborah A. Smith, DST Systems, Inc., Myrl C. Jeffcoat and others
Plaintiff:
Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb, Inc. and Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc.
Defendant:
Percy Payne, Brenda Keeton, Kathleen Moerschel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Daniels #230824 v. Mindlin et al
as 2:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Lyle S. Mindlin, Deborah J. Smith, Mary H. Hearing and others
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Daniels #230824
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
