Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Robles, et al v. United States, et al
as 22-3017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL M. ROBLES and BONNIE ROBLES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General, State of Kansas and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CAMMELOT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2021cv02997
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S CAMMELOT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DENNIS MCDONOUGH, RICHARD L. ROUDEBUSH V.A. MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Burns v McDonough et al
as 0:2021cv02549
Defendant:
Theressa Burns, Department of VA, Secretary Denis McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
CAMMELOT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2021cv02823
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S CAMMELOT and CRAIG S. CAMMELOT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DENNIS MCDONOUGH, RICHARD L. ROUDEBUSH V.A. MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cantrell v. Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Harvey Cantrell
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs and Dennis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Robles et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv04047
Plaintiff:
Gabriel M. Robles and Bonnie Robles
Defendant:
United States of America, Louis Dejoy, Derek Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
