Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,210
Donald Vaughan v. Burnice Mace
as 24-6317
Plaintiff: DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Defendant: BURNICE MACE, RN, BSN, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, in whole capacity, CORIZON HEALTH and others
Donald Vaughan v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6290
Petitioner: DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Carter v. Stubbs et al
as 1:2024mc00192
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant: Calli A. Stubbs and DOC Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermaine Carter v. Calli Stubbs, et al
as 24-1937
Plaintiff: JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant: CALLI A. STUBBS, Medical Doctor and DOC, Commissioner
Morales v. MN DOC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv01091
Plaintiff: Reynaldo Morales
Defendant: MN DOC, MCF - Faribault, Jodi Atinsted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifton Williams v. George Little, et al
as 24-1903
Plaintiff: CLIFTON WILLIAMS
Defendant: GEORGE M. LITTLE, Unknown (Former Sec'y PA Dept. of Corrections (DOC)), LAUREL HARRY, Secretary PA Department of Corrections (DOC), KERI MOORE, Acting DOC Chief Grievance Officer and others
KING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff: SHAWN KING
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, MR. MATIYASIC, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6229
Petitioner: LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Craig v. The City of New York
as 24-1180
Plaintiff: ALBERT CRAIG
Defendant: THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Correction Officer ELIAS HUSAMUDEEN, DOC Correction Officer, Former Commissioner CYNTHIA BRANN, Former DOC Commissioner and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?