Cases 11 - 20 of 26
MCCLURE et al v. GIBSON GUITAR CORP. et al
as 1:2017cv01130
Plaintiff:
REBECCA ALLEN and KATRISHA MCCLURE
Defendant:
DONALD CRAWFORD, GIBSON BRANDS, INC. and GIBSON GUITAR CORP.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
HUNT v. MILLER et al
as 1:2016cv01214
Plaintiff:
DONALD CRAWFORD HUNT
Defendant:
SANDRA MILLER, LLOYD GOINS, RALPH KERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD v. WMATA
as 1:2016cv00260
Defendant:
WMATA
Plaintiff:
DONALD CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donald Crawford Sr et al v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv10598
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Does, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Crawford, Sr, James Wilson and Sharon Wilson
United States of America v. Mel's Trucking, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv04090
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mels Trucking, Inc and Melvin Donald Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Chemence, Inc. et al v. Quinn et al
as 1:2011cv03800
Plaintiff:
Chemence, Inc. and Chemence Medical Products, Inc.
Defendant:
James Quinn, Carlos Morales, Sapheon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Donald Crawford v. We Hall Business, et al
as 10-16024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
WE HALL BUSINESS, PACIFIC CORRUGATED PIPE CO., JACK PARSON and others
Crawford v. We Hall Business et al
as 2:2008cv03105
Plaintiff:
Donald Crawford
Defendant:
We Hall Business, Pacific Corrugated Pipe Co., Jack Parson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crawford v. Rose
as 8:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Donald Crawford
Defendant:
Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Calhoun v. Botos et al
as 5:2008cv10051
Plaintiff:
Delphon Calhoun
Defendant:
William Botos, Robert Harvey, Millicent Warren and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
