Cases 11 - 20 of 1,645
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04283
Defendant:
Mayor Bill De Balsio, Kathy Hochul, Mayor Eric L. Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie E. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles E. Williams, Jr v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02797
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Blankenship v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Shane Blankenship
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, E. Williams, A Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivers v. South Mountain Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Defendant:
South Mountain Justice Center, Viswanath Dhyaram, Brian Crimp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01146
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Williams
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv05140
Plaintiff:
DANA E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2024cv01255
Plaintiff:
Greggory E. Williams
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare Inc.
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
GARLAND E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
