Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Williams v. Richardson Plowden & Robinson PA
as 6:2013cv00922
Plaintiff:
Garrett Williams
Defendant:
Richardson Plowden & Robinson PA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garrett Williams v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 11-1320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARRETT WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and CATHERINE MCVEY, Chairman of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, in their official capacities
Williams v. Beard et al
as 1:2009cv01587
Plaintiff:
Garrett Williams
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, - and Catherine McVey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2009cv00985
Petitioner:
GARRETT WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2008cv13470
Plaintiff:
Steven Garrett Williams
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Quarterman
as 1:2008cv00035
Petitioner:
Michael Garrett Williams
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv04248
Petitioner:
Michael Garrett Williams
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawton v. Worley et al
as 3:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Lawton
Defendant:
James Worley, Loretta House, Portia Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Wilkins et al
as 3:2007cv00063
Plaintiff:
John Harris
Defendant:
Ronnie Wilkins, Henry Ponton and Garrett Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
