Cases 11 - 20 of 72
MILLER v. TICE et al
as 2:2022cv01599
Petitioner:
GARY PAUL MILLER
Respondent:
WARDEN MR. TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BLAIR and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04190
Plaintiff:
GARY R MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77480
Plaintiff:
GARY DEAN MILLER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Gari Miller
as 20-4174
Defendant / Appellant:
GARI TERRELL MILLER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Miller v. HEB Grocery Company, L.P.
as 5:2019cv01376
Plaintiff:
Gary Alan Miller
Defendant:
HEB Grocery Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Gary Miller v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 19-2536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary W. Miller
Defendant / Appellee:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, A Delaware corporation
Seastrand v. US Bank N.A., et al
as 19-4091
Defendant:
JACKLYN W. MILLER, an individual, MILLER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Utah corporation, MILLWOOD COMPANIES, a Utah limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US BANK N.A., a nationally chartered bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SEASTRAND
Miller vs. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00259
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Miller
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
