Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Heather-Lee Mehudar v. Gloria Juhn et al
as 2:2022mc00169
Plaintiff:
Heather-Lee Mehudar
Defendant:
Gloria Juhn, Constance Connie Kemi Juhn doing business as Trustee, Judy Jung A Lee and others
Heather Lee Kahler et al v. City of Burbank et al
as 2:2022cv05844
Plaintiff:
Heather Lee Kahler and B.T.O.
Defendant:
City of Burbank, Miguel Camarena and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Heather Lee Mehudar
as 2:2022mc00157
Plaintiff:
Heather Lee Mehudar and Heather-Lee Mehudar
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Minor v. NextGen Leads, LLC
as 3:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Heather Lee Minor
Defendant:
NextGen Leads, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Roshune Carelock v. Jeff Johnson
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSHUNE LEMARR CARELOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF JOHNSON, LYNETTE PATTON, WILLIAM BARNES and others
Defendant:
TRACY BLACK, NATALIE GAMBLE, MR. CHARLES and others
Allstate Insurance Company v. Lee et al
as 4:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Allen Lee, Heather Lee, Shannon Peck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Cullens et al v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00273
Plaintiff:
Carlos Londray Cullens and Al-Huda School Tucson
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Arizona Department of Economic Security, Tucson Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carelock v. Johnson et al
as 5:2020cv01635
Defendant:
Tiffany Jones, Lynnette Patton, Sharon Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roshune Lemarr Carelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammon v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00736
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Heather Lee Hammon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEE et al
as 4:2019cv00165
Defendant:
STACY J LEE and HEATHER LEE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
