Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Howard et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03976
Plaintiff:
Ella Jean Howard and John Aubrey Howard, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canada v. Howard
as 8:2012cv01171
Petitioner:
Zavien Lenoy Canada
Respondent:
E Jean Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Howard et al v. Hart et al
as 2:2011cv01273
Plaintiff:
Norma Jean Howard , Deana D Howard , Thomas Howard and others
Defendant:
Darwin Dean Hart , Unknown Hart , Design Transportation Services Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOWARD v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv02263
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN JEAN HOWARD
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 4:2009cv00120
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Jean Howard
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SCOTT et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE TERRY SCOTT, JESSE COX, SUZANNE WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Campbell v. Greenville County Sheriff Department et al
as 9:2008cv04078
Plaintiff:
Walter Lomax Campbell
Defendant:
Greenville County Sheriff Department, Deputy Sheriff Department, B A Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott et al v SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2008cv01987
Plaintiff:
Claude Terry Scott, Jesse Cox, Suzanne Williams and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Howard v. City Of Freeport et al
as 3:2008cv50156
Plaintiff:
Jean Howard
Defendant:
City Of Freeport and Bryan Politsch
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
