Cases 11 - 20 of 28
BROCK v. WASHINGTON COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY
as 3:2014cv00242
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROCK
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROCKING v. NOVARTIS INTERNATIONAL AG et al
as 2:2014cv04145
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROCKING
Defendant:
NOVARTIS INTERNATIONAL AG, NOVARTIS PHARMA AG and NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Brock et al
as 1:2014cv22038
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Norma Diaz Brock , James Brock and Richard D. Brock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
BROCK v. CAMERON
as 3:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROCK
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON, HUNT, NEGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Astrue
as 8:2012cv03135
Plaintiff:
James Brock Phillips, III
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
James Brock Williams v. United State
as 11-3462
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Brock Williams
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Adkins et al v. Consolidation Coal Company et al
as 2:2011cv00285
Plaintiff:
Melissa Adkins and Jessie Reuben Adkins
Defendant:
Consolidation Coal Company , Consol Energy, Inc. , Todd Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bay #251581 et al v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Tony Bay, Raleem LNU, Xavier LNU and others
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Dennis M. Straub, Robert Mulvaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bay et al v. Caruso et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2009cv15008
Plaintiff:
Tony Bay, Raleem LNU, Xavier LNU and others
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Dennis M Straub, Robert Mulvaney and others
Williams v. USADO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2009cv03473
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Brock Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
