Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Larry Johnson v. City of Kentwood, MI, et al
as 20-1568
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN MICHAEL CHRISTENSEN, named as, John Doe prosecutor, CARLA TETT, an individual, TIMOTHY FRIES, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY JOHNSON
Johnson v. Kentwood, City of et al
as 1:2019cv00834
Defendant:
James Connell, Kentwood, City of, Carla Tett and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAD v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2018cv03900
Defendant:
MR. HARMAN, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL, MR. JAMES CONNELL and others
Plaintiff:
AHMED GAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Herman
as 16-2001
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ROSALIND HERMAN
Interested Party:
BRUCE GILMARTIN, JOHN BIGELOW, CARLA BIGELOW and others
James Anthony v. Jay Cassady
as 16-1548
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Connell Anthony
Respondent - Appellee:
Jay Cassady, Warden
Anthony v. Cassady
as 6:2015cv03328
Petitioner:
James Connell Anthony
Respondent:
Jay Cassady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Selenske v. Selenske et al
as 2:2012cv00577
Plaintiff:
Richard Selenske
Defendant:
Robert Selenske, Joy Pecha, William Selenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connell et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2012cv00828
Plaintiff:
James Connell and Robin Connell
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedure (RESPA) Act
Springston et al v. Life Partners Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00443
Plaintiff:
Bryan Springston and James Connell
Respondent:
Life Partners Inc. , Life Partners Holdings, Inc. , Brian D. Pardo and others
Intervenor:
Frederick Vieira and Anthony Taylor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
ANDERSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv06318
Plaintiff:
NASHEEN ANDERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , ROBERT HOOVER , OBIE HAZARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
