Cases 11 - 20 of 198
Doe et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06665
Plaintiff:
John 1 Doe and John 2 Doe
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Bravo v. Garland
as 1:2022cv06736
Plaintiff:
Luis Bravo
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOWE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. LOWE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DUSTY RUSSELL, C. HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rosa
Defendant:
Rollin Cook, William Mulligan, Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lech v. Gettel et al
as 2:2022cv11197
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lech
Defendant:
Gina Gettel, Perry Curtis, W Mark Fondren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Monk v. Turn Key Medical
as 22-40317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant / Appellee:
Turn Key Medical, Phipps, Nurse, Hillhouse and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maxwell v. Almanza
as 21-11239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Maxwell
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Almanza, Jr., Major of Correctional Officers-French Robertson Unit, Carmen Walker, LVN-Hendrick Medical Center, John #1 Doe, Correctional Officer-French Robertson Unit and others
Mendoza v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2021cv01503
Plaintiff:
Maria Mendoza
Defendant:
City of Portland by and through Portland Police Bureau, Portland Police Offc John 1 Doe, Portland Police Offc John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boodie v. Streeval et al
as 7:2021cv00496
Plaintiff:
Robert Boodie
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Mrs. Saylor, Mrs. Handshell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
