Cases 11 - 20 of 18,647
Aunhkhotep v. Jordan et al
as 4:2024cv01278
Defendant:
John D. Jordan, Justin Barlow, United States Marshal Office and others
Plaintiff:
Aunhk Ra Aunhkhotep
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUIZ v. MONMOUTH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2024cv09342
Defendant:
IHRHIEM IANH, MR. DAN, MONMOUTH COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
VERNON S. RUIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliland v. Blue Installations LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01120
Defendant:
Blue Installations LLC, Bryan L. Kouba, West Decor LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Gilliland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jordan v. Aunspagn et al
as 6:2024cv06128
Defendant:
Dr. L. Seamster, Jerry Bradshaw, Virginia Strickland and others
Plaintiff:
Silford Jordan, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv01507
Petitioner:
Bryan Jordan
Respondent:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Crunch, LLC
as 1:2024cv07118
Plaintiff:
Kristi Jordan
Defendant:
Crunch, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 271
JORDAN v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04972
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
AUBREY JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McGee v. South West Airlines et al
as 3:2024cv02363
Defendant:
Bob Jordan, Gary Kelley and South West Airlines
Plaintiff:
Kamon Renard McGee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robinson et al v. Vance et al
as 1:2024cv04210
Defendant:
Russell Mathis, Jordan M. Vance and DeKalb County, Georgia
Plaintiff:
Mark A.C. Robinson and Jasmine M. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
