Cases 11 - 20 of 55
BARTOL v. BARROWCLOUGH et al
as 2:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BARTOL
Defendant:
ADAM BARROWCLOUGH , SHAWN RYAN , ANDREW O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv01163
Plaintiff:
Marion K. McCarthy
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Wesley v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2016cv01205
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clarence Wesley
Defendant:
Kathryn K. McCarthy, Mark Baker and Alan J. Popick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin, Jr. v. Salem Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv13555
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Salem Police Department , Mary Butler , Mark Losolfo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCarthy et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 1:2013cv00975
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. McCarthy and Carol K. McCarthy
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company , Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., Chase Manhatten Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Wesley v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv02226
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wesley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Vincent Mooney, Anthony Luscavage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv19699
Plaintiff:
Lori K. McCarthy
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCarthy v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-19699
Plaintiff:
Lori K. McCarthy
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Jones v. Mattingly et al
as 2:2013cv02128
Plaintiff:
Louis T Jones
Defendant:
Gregory Mattingly, Scott B Diamond, Kathy K McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
