Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Powell v. Joseph Bateman et al
as 1:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Powell
Defendant:
Joseph Bateman, J. Hiatt, Carl Manis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Pare v. Houff Transfer, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Christine Pare
Defendant:
Houff Transfer, Inc. and Kenneth Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01208
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dearmon v. MDOC et al
as 1:2019cv00168
Defendant:
SMCI, Eugene Wigelsworth, MDOC and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott Dearmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. MCA Financial Group Limited
as 4:2018mc02140
Plaintiff:
William Shelton, Aaron Dunning, James Stephens and others
Respondent:
MidCap Financial Trust and MidCap Funding X Trust
Defendant:
MCA Financial Group Limited
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Powell v. Davis et al
as 3:2018cv00472
Defendant:
Gene Newsome, Roger Davis, Kenneth Powell and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. MCA Financial Group Limited
as 2:2018mc00042
Plaintiff:
William Shelton, Aaron Dunning, James Stephens and others
Defendant:
MCA Financial Group Limited
Respondent:
MidCap Financial Trust and MidCap Funding X Trust
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Powell v. Melvin et al
as 1:2018cv01009
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Powell
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, T. Kennedy, Emelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommy White v. Jacqueline Banks, et al
as 17-60645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY DEMINTO WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELINE BANKS, MARSHALL TURNER, HUBERT DAVIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
