Cases 11 - 20 of 1,705
Davis v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65141
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Davis
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lord v. U.S. Marshall Ralph Sozio
as 24-789
Plaintiff:
KRIS LORD
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall RALPH SOZIO, U.S. Marshall Director RONALD L. DAVIS, U.S. Marshall VINCENT F. DEMARCO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wallace v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Tanua Wallace and Frankie Junior Jennings
Defendant:
United States of America, Eric Tillman and Ronald L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. Richards et al
as 4:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Brian RaMon Hughes
Defendant:
Haynes, Caffey, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Richards et al
as 5:2024cv05069
Plaintiff:
Brian Ramon Hughes
Defendant:
Sergeant Marilyn Richards, Corporal Haynes, Corporal Caffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Connie L. Davis
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., Kroger Limited Partnership 1, John Doe Person(s) 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Whitmore v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Whitmore
Defendant:
Ronald L. Davis, Michael Downey, Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc. v. Parkhill Imaging, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01791
Defendant:
Stanley L. Davis, Parkhill Imaging, LLC doing business as Parkhill Imaging Addison, Parkhill Imaging Clearfork, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
