Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Curtis Johnson et al v. City of Berkeley et al
as 3:2015cv05343
Plaintiff:
Curtis Johnson , Moni Law , Joseph Cuff and others
Defendant:
City of Berkeley , City of Hayward, Christine Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyundai Rotem Company v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2015cv10132
Plaintiff:
Hyundai Rotem Company
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority , Massachusetts Department of Transportation , John R Jenkins and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Bombardier Transit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loux et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as OR/3:14-cv-01287
Plaintiff:
Donna Loux and Gregory Loux
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Loux et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 3:2014cv01287
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Plaintiff:
Donna Loux and Gregory Loux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Senne et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al
as 3:2014cv00608
Plaintiff:
Lee Smith, Nick Giarraputo, Matt Frevert and others
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Baseball P'ship, Cleveland Indians Basebell Co., L.P., Baltimore Orioles, L.P. and others
Intervenor:
Cody Sedlock, Edwin Mateo, Luis Yarnel Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
LOUX v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv07185
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL M. LOUX
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILSON, LAWTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loux v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv04023
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Robert Loux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Spencer et al v. Loux
as 1:2011cv12338
Plaintiff:
Jerome Spencer, Karen D Brown Holmes and Sheila Brown
Defendant:
Janice Loux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
